Dans une grande entreprise, une campagne de créateurs demande beaucoup de oui : le créateur, le budget, le brief, l’accord, le contenu, la facture et le déblocage des fonds. Circuit de validation place la bonne personne à chaque étape et vous montre exactement où ça bloque.
Ce qu’elle contient
Créateurs, budgets, campagnes, briefs, accords, contenus, factures et déblocage des fonds.
Placez la bonne personne à chaque étape.
Les étapes s’enchaînent, ou se déroulent en parallèle quand c’est logique.
Sachez sur quel bureau se trouve la décision.
Chaque validation est conservée.
Comment ça marche
Ce qui doit être validé.
Qui valide, et dans quel ordre.
Le premier relecteur la reçoit tout de suite.
Chaque validation ouvre l’étape suivante.
Fonctionne avec
Des campagnes de créateurs où chaque clic, inscription et vente est crédité au créateur qui l’a généré.
Espaces de travailGérez plusieurs marques clientes séparément, avec des accès définis par personne et par marque.
ÉquipeChaque collègue a son propre accès, et seulement les droits dont son poste a besoin.
BriefLivrables, dates et révisions convenus par écrit avant que quiconque commence.
Autres fonctionnalités : Convenir du travail et le mener
Le guide complet est en anglais.
Approval Chain lets large brands and agencies build the process around those decisions. Put the right people in the right order. Make every step visible. And know exactly what is waiting on whom.
Large companies don't have one approval process.
The problem is that the structure often lives in people's heads, email threads, spreadsheets and internal messages. So when something gets stuck, nobody immediately knows:
There is no single "correct" enterprise approval chain.
Content approval is one possible use.
It is not the whole product. Approval Chain can sit around the decisions that happen before, during and after the content exists.
Should we work with this creator?
Should we spend this amount?
Should this campaign go ahead?
Are we aligned on what the creator is being asked to deliver?
Are these commercial terms acceptable?
Is this work ready to go live?
Is this invoice valid and ready for payment?
Creator work often involves significant budgets.
That means the person who approves the work may not be the person who approves the money.
"Yes, approve the ₦20 million budget." Finance: "Yes, the commercial documentation is complete."
"Release the funds." Each person has a different responsibility. Approval Chain keeps those responsibilities separate while keeping the overall process connected.
A large organisation may also have a formal process for onboarding or selecting creators.
A campaign might require approval before it launches.
Once the campaign is running, the content itself may need another chain.
The content chain is different from the budget chain. And that's okay. The organisation gets to build each process around the actual decision being made.
The campaign is complete.
The point of an approval chain isn't to involve as many people as possible.
Good approval infrastructure reflects how authority actually works inside the organisation.
Some decisions depend on previous decisions.
You shouldn't ask Finance to release funds before the required commercial approvals are complete. You shouldn't ask Legal to approve an agreement that hasn't been commercially agreed. You shouldn't ask the client to approve content that the agency hasn't reviewed. The chain makes those dependencies explicit.
Everyone knows when their responsibility begins.
Not every approval depends on the previous one.
Legal and Brand may both need to review something independently. The process should reflect that too. Approval Chain isn't about forcing every organisation into one rigid sequence. It is about giving the organisation a defined approval structure that matches how the decision actually works.
This is one of the simplest and most valuable things Approval Chain does.
A large organisation can lose days without anyone intentionally causing a delay.
Approval Chain gives large brands a way to bring their internal approval structures into creator operations. Marketing can keep control of marketing decisions. Finance can keep control of financial decisions. Legal can keep control of legal decisions. Executives can approve the decisions that actually require executive authority.
The creator gets a clearer path through the organisation. The organisation gets control without turning every campaign into a manual chase.
Agencies often sit between creators and clients.
Creator → Account Manager → Creative Director → Client Brand Manager → Client Marketing Director. The agency can ensure the work is ready before the client sees it. The client can maintain its own approval authority. Everyone knows where the work sits.
Creators don't build the approval chain.
Add the people or roles that need to approve it. Put them in the appropriate order.
Each step has a person or authority responsible for the decision.
The request, work or commercial item enters the chain.
The current approver sees what they are responsible for approving.
They approve it or request the required change.
Once a required step is complete, the next step becomes active.
Everyone with the appropriate visibility can see where the item is and what is still outstanding.
When every required approval is complete, the underlying action can proceed.
The approval history remains available as part of the commercial record.
A ₦20 MILLION CREATOR CAMPAIGN
The organisation doesn't need five different email threads to prove who approved what.
The chain shows the entire decision.
A creator delivers a campaign Reel.
The creator can see that it is waiting on the Marketing Director rather than wondering why nobody has responded.
The organisation keeps the approval record.
A creator completes the agreed campaign.
Campaigns manage the commercial engagement.
Approval Chain manages the internal decisions required to move that engagement forward.
This is why Approval Chain belongs around Campaigns rather than being reduced to a content-review feature.
The Brief says what the creator is being asked to make.
Approval Chain can govern whether the Brief itself needs internal approval before it reaches the creator. For example: Campaign Manager creates Brief. Brand Manager approves. Digital Marketing Manager approves. CMO approves budget. Brief is released to the creator. The approval process happens before production begins.
An Agreement formalises the terms between the parties.
But a large organisation may need internal approval before that Agreement can be signed.
Then the authorised party signs. The Agreement is the legal document. Approval Chain is the internal decision process that gets it approved.
Payouts moves money.
Approval Chain determines whether the organisation has completed the internal approvals required before that money is released.
Different clients and brands may have completely different approval structures.
This is where the feature becomes powerful.
Email can communicate a decision.
It is not a decision-management system.
| Klairova Approval Chain | ||
|---|---|---|
| Define approval order | Yes | No |
| Assign responsibility | Yes | Informal |
| Different approval stages | Yes | Scattered |
| Show current approver | Yes | No |
| Show what is waiting | Yes | Difficult |
| Show how long it has waited | Yes | No |
| Keep approval history | Yes | Scattered |
| Connect decisions to creator work | Yes | No |
| Connect to campaigns | Yes | No |
| Connect to commercial workflow | Yes | No |
| Repeatable across clients | Yes | Manual |
| Enterprise governance | Yes | Poorly suited |
The larger the organisation, the more expensive an undocumented process becomes.
| Klairova Approval Chain | Manual Process | |
|---|---|---|
| Defined approval path | Yes | Often informal |
| Named responsibility | Yes | Often unclear |
| Sequential approvals | Yes | Manual |
| Status visibility | Yes | Limited |
| Bottleneck visibility | Yes | No |
| Approval record | Yes | Scattered |
| Works across departments | Yes | Difficult |
| Repeatable | Yes | Depends on people |
| Creator visibility | Yes, where appropriate | Usually none |
| Connected to creator workflow | Yes | Usually separate |
A few things matter.
If Legal needs to review the Agreement before signature, put Legal where that decision actually belongs. USE PARALLEL APPROVAL WHERE APPROPRIATE. If two teams can independently approve the same thing, don't create unnecessary waiting. MAKE THE CHAIN MATCH THE COMPANY. A startup and a multinational should not have the same approval structure.
The point is configurability. SET EXPECTATIONS FOR REVIEW. If an approval normally takes three days, don't promise a creator that the campaign launches tomorrow. The approval process is part of the campaign timeline. DON'T LET APPROVAL BECOME INVISIBLE. The whole value is knowing where a decision is.
If people still have to ask: "Who has this?" the process isn't doing its job.
The creator economy has grown up.
Approval Chain gives the organisation a defined way to move decisions through the people who have authority to make them. Not just for content. For the work around the content.
And whatever else your organisation needs to control. Because when the organisation gets bigger, "just ask Sarah" stops being a system.
For large brands with multiple departments, approval authorities and financial controls.
For agencies managing creator work internally and across multiple client organisations.
Creators submit into approval chains created by brands and agencies. They don't have to understand or configure the organisation's internal approval structure.
Approval Chain is available with:
Enterprise accounts. Agency accounts. It is designed for organisations where creator operations involve multiple people, departments and levels of authority.
Approval Chain is Klairova's enterprise and agency approval infrastructure. It lets organisations create defined approval workflows for creator-related decisions such as creator selection, budgets, campaigns, agreements, content, invoices, fund releases and other internal approvals.
No. Content approval is only one possible use. Approval Chain is designed for the wider decision-making process around creator operations.
Yes. An organisation can create an approval process for deciding whether a creator should be engaged.
Yes. Budget approval can be part of a chain, including approval by senior marketing or finance leadership where required.
Yes. A CMO can be an approver where the organisation's internal process requires CMO approval.
Yes. A CFO or other authorised finance leader can be included where financial approval is required.
Yes. The chain can include Brand Managers and other people with the authority to approve a particular decision.
Yes. The chain is designed around the organisation's actual decision-makers.
Yes. That is one of the reasons to use Approval Chain. The person responsible for creator selection may not be the person responsible for budget, legal, content or payment approval.
Yes. A campaign can have an approval workflow around its required decisions.
Yes. A Brief can require internal approval before being released to the creator.
Yes. An organisation can require internal approvals before an Agreement is signed.
Yes. An invoice can go through the required delivery, commercial and finance approvals before payment.
Yes. Fund release can be part of an approval workflow. The approval determines whether the organisation authorises the release; Payouts handles the movement of money.
Creators can see the relevant status and where their work is in the process.
They do not configure the organisation's internal chain.
No. Creators submit into chains created by brands and agencies. The Enterprise or Agency account is where the organisation manages its approval infrastructure.
The organisation using Approval Chain builds the workflow. That is typically the brand or agency.
Yes. Different clients can have different approval requirements.
Yes. External parties such as clients can be included where appropriate.
Sequential approval is the core model. Where approvals are genuinely independent, the workflow can accommodate that rather than forcing unnecessary waiting.
The exact permission and configuration rules depend on the implementation. The important principle is that the organisation defines who has authority for each step.
Yes. The approval record identifies who approved the relevant item and when.
Yes. The chain shows the current step and what remains before the process is complete.
Yes. The system is designed to make the current bottleneck and the time spent there visible.
The chain makes the blocked step visible so the organisation can address the responsibility rather than allowing the request to disappear inside an inbox.
The exact reassignment controls depend on the implementation.
Yes. The approval record and relevant version history remain available so the organisation can establish what was approved and when.
Because an approval is only useful if you know what was actually approved. If the work changes after approval, the organisation needs to distinguish the approved version from later versions.
Yes. Financial approvals are one of the important enterprise use cases.
Where procurement approval is part of the organisation's creator workflow, Procurement can be represented as an approval step.
Yes. Legal can be an approval step for agreements, content or other work requiring legal review.
Yes. Content approval is supported, but it is only one part of the broader Approval Chain system.
Yes. The approval process can govern whether an invoice or payment is approved before funds are released.
No. Campaigns manages the creator campaign. Approval Chain manages the internal decisions required to move that campaign forward.
No. Brief defines what is being requested. Approval Chain governs who needs to approve that request.
No. Agreement is the formal contract between the parties. Approval Chain can determine whether the organisation has completed its internal approvals before that Agreement is signed.
No. Approval Chain governs authorisation. Payouts handles the movement of money after the required conditions are met.
No. Approval Chain is available with Enterprise and Agency accounts.
Because it is designed for organisations with multiple decision-makers, departments, approval authorities and financial controls. A solo creator usually does not need a CMO → CFO → Finance → Legal workflow.
A large organisation might.
Yes. The point is to reflect the different approval requirements across creator operations rather than force every decision through one generic chain.
Yes. Those are different decisions with different authorities, so they can have different workflows.
Yes, particularly in agency and enterprise environments where different brands or clients have different approval structures.
It replaces the approval process that would otherwise be managed through email and manual chasing. Email can still be used for communication. The important decisions have a structured workflow and record.
No. Approval Chain is designed to provide approval infrastructure for creator-related and connected commercial workflows inside Klairova. Your organisation may have other approval processes outside Klairova.
Ouvrez un compte en quelques minutes. L’utilisation ne vous coûte rien ; une petite commission s’applique seulement quand de l’argent passe par Klairova.
Créer votre compte gratuitAcceptez des partenariats, vendez votre travail et soyez payé pour les résultats que vous produisez.
Menez des campagnes de créateurs payées au résultat, avec le reste de votre marketing à côté.
Montrez aux annonceurs ce que font vos lecteurs après vous avoir lu, et vendez sur cette base.